[Person-ontology] Question: "How does this compare to FOAF or SIOC?"

[ajitorsarah at bellsouth.net]

 would point to the response by one of the participants.

..."So the combination of Higgins and XDI could, as Jim suggests, provide a bridge
> between the world of formal ontologies and rich new set of identity-enabled,
> user-centric applications for the benefit of both individuals and businesses
> the world over."

With this as an umbrella guideline I would hope we can engage in the details as we desire to achive a pragmatic goal-I think "the sky is the limit" but we must bind the scope to achive progress that is implementable to address common information architecture tennets-definition, discovery, and use.

ajit



-------------- Original message from "Schoening, James R Mr CIV USA AMC" <James.Schoening at us.Army.Mil>: -------------- 


> All, 
> 
> Paola Dimaio (who is considering subscribing to this group) asks 
> "How does this compare to FOAF or SIOC?" 
> 
> Jim 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: ontolog-forum-bounces at ontolog.cim3.net 
> [mailto:ontolog-forum-bounces at ontolog.cim3.net] On Behalf Of 
> paola.dimaio at gmail.com 
> Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2007 12:00 AM 
> To: [ontolog-forum] 
> Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] Potential Killer-App for Semantic Web 
> 
> James 
> thanks for posting this 
> 
> For completeness, could you expand quickly on the proposed scope, and 
> how does it compare to FOAF or SIOC. 
> I understand further discussions is happening on the other list - but 
> just to help us decide whether to join or not thanks! 
> PDM 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Person-ontology mailing list 
> Person-ontology at idcommons.net 
> http://idcommons.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/person-ontology 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://idcommons.net/pipermail/person-ontology/attachments/20071004/c726bca4/attachment.htm